THE CONTINENTAL NEWS™

Read Beyond the Headlines
BREAKING · U.S. MILITARY JUSTICE
UNITED STATES · MILITARY · JUSTICE

THE ORDER IS SIGNED.
THE FIRING SQUAD COMES NEXT.

Seventeen years after 13 people were killed at Fort Hood, America is preparing for a form of military execution it has not used since the Second World War.
Nidal Hasan, convicted in the 2009 Fort Hood mass shooting
Nidal Hasan, the former U.S. Army major convicted of killing 13 people at Fort Hood in November 2009. File photograph.

Somewhere inside the machinery of the United States Army, an extraordinary process will now begin. There is no execution date yet. There is no announced place. But the decision that matters most has been made. Nidal Hasan, the former Army psychiatrist sentenced to death for the 2009 Fort Hood massacre, is to face an Army firing squad. If the order is carried out, America will cross a line it has not crossed in generations.

On November 5, 2009, Hasan opened fire inside the Soldier Readiness Processing Center at Fort Hood in Texas, now called Fort Cavazos. Thirteen people were killed and 32 were wounded. Most of those attacked were soldiers preparing for deployment or carrying out the ordinary business of military life. Hasan himself was shot, badly wounded and arrested at the scene. He was subsequently left partially paralysed.

Four years later, a military jury convicted him of premeditated murder and attempted murder and sentenced him to death. During his court-martial, Hasan represented himself. He acknowledged carrying out the attack and said he had acted in opposition to American military operations in Muslim countries. There was little mystery about who had fired the shots. The long argument was instead about what the military justice system would eventually do with the man who fired them.

For seventeen years the story waited in courtrooms and appeals. Now it is moving toward a wall, a command and a line of rifles.

That answer has now become considerably clearer. The Pentagon announced that Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth had recommended execution by U.S. Army firing squad and that President Donald Trump had approved the method. The Secretary of the Army is expected to determine when and where the sentence will be carried out.

The historical weight of the decision is difficult to miss. The United States military has not executed a prisoner since 1961. That execution was by hanging. The last known U.S. military execution by firing squad occurred in 1945. If Hasan is placed before an Army firing squad, an instrument of military punishment associated in the public imagination with another age will suddenly become part of twenty-first-century America.

That is why this story is larger than Hasan. The horror of what happened at Fort Hood is established by the dead, the wounded and the court record. Nothing in the debate over capital punishment diminishes what happened to them. But an execution by firing squad inevitably raises another question. What does justice look like when a modern state deliberately returns to one of its oldest methods of killing?

To supporters of the sentence, the answer will be simple. Hasan murdered 13 people, wounded dozens more, received a military trial and went through years of legal proceedings. Execution, in that view, is not spectacle. It is the final enforcement of a lawful sentence for an extraordinary crime. For families who have lived with November 5, 2009, for almost seventeen years, even the word “final” may carry a meaning outsiders cannot fully understand.

Opponents of capital punishment will see something different. They will argue that the method itself matters and that a firing squad places the physical reality of state killing before the public with unusual starkness. There are no clinical euphemisms in the phrase. Rifles are loaded. Human beings are ordered to fire. Another human being dies because the state has decided that he must.

Those two truths now stand beside each other. Thirteen people went to Fort Hood one November morning and never returned home. The man convicted of killing them has spent years under a death sentence. Now the final machinery has begun to move.

The Army will eventually announce a time and a place. Lawyers may still fight over what can be fought over. Protesters may gather. Families may speak. Politicians will almost certainly turn the moment into an argument about justice, terrorism, punishment and power.

But at the end of all those arguments lies something far less abstract. If the sentence is carried out, a group of soldiers will receive an order that no American military firing squad has received in more than eight decades.

And then someone will give the command to fire.

WHY THIS MATTERS

Hasan's planned execution would be the first execution conducted by the United States military since 1961. A U.S. military firing squad has not been used since the Second World War. The Pentagon has not yet announced the execution date or location.

The Continental News editorial note: This article combines reported facts surrounding the Fort Hood case with editorial analysis of the extraordinary historical significance of the proposed execution. Details concerning the eventual execution date and location remain subject to further official announcement.
◆ ◆ ◆